š¬ #3 The Film That Terrified Kubrick
Hi thereĀ from a cold and hazy London. Possibly inspired by the dark, mist-filled, streets of the capital come this week's two films. Neither you'dĀ describe asĀ horror, and neither has any of the visual tropes associated with the genre [likeĀ darkness or mist] but both linger with you more effectively than most modern 'horror' films.
Ā Ā
Happy choosing,Ā happy viewing,
Bry
FILM ONE: SPOORLOOSĀ [THE VANISHING]
1988 Dir George Sluizer
There are lots of incredible moments in this filmĀ that revolvesĀ around the disappearance of a woman and her boyfriend's obsessive quest to find out what happened to her. One of the mostĀ enduring in my mind is the character and performance of the 'antagonist.' He's more charming, likeable and charismatic than the protagonists. In fact, ironically, most of the levity comes from scenes involving him. The structure also simultaneously revealsĀ information too early but stillĀ manages to build tension, which shouldn't really be possible. For this and many other reasons, whenĀ I first saw the film I toldĀ everyone to watch it immediately even if they couldn't care less.
Sluizer remade the film in American in 1993 as TheĀ Vanishing, but this version was a critical flopĀ compared with the original. Most, if not all of the original film, takes placeĀ during the day in urban/pastoral populated environments. Yet Sluizer manages to create a sense of tragic,Ā unsettling inevitability - like a horrible premonition you can't shake. And he does so without so much as a trembling violin note or any of the otherĀ suitcase-filling cliches filmmakers resort to. It's theĀ structural sense of procedure that gives the compulsion fuelled tragedy a sense ofĀ indifference.Ā Like some kind of sterile thoughtĀ experiment that's been methodically planned out. Kubrick himself called Sluizer to tell him it was the most terrifying film he'd ever seen. Seems like indifference and compulsion are the two sides ofĀ trueĀ horror. This film is firmly in my top 10. Ā Ā Ā Ā
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
TL;DR why should I spend 1 hr 47 minutes of myĀ precious life watching this? George Sluizer crafts a film that leaves a lasting impression on you, from a simple story of a missingĀ woman and the man compelled to find her, toĀ the funniest, most charming, most unlikely psychopath you've ever met.
Trailer:Ā Don't search for it, go in cold.
*Available for a small rental fee on YouTube, Apple TV, Sky and Google Play*Ā Ā
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
Fact: The film was the Netherland's Best Foreign Language film submission to the Oscars that year but wasĀ dismissed for having too much FrenchĀ dialogue.
FILM TWO: PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK
1975 Dir Peter Weir
Peter Weir is one of those directors who has never made a bad film. This entry in hisĀ filmography is possibly one of his most elusive toĀ describe. It's based on a book just as Spoorloos is and like the film above, revolves around theĀ disappearance of young women. But unlike Spoorloos it's not just one young woman butĀ multipleĀ who vanish in broad daylight, during a school trip in 1900.
Like Spoorloos, Weir uses none of the tricks associated with the horror genre but still manages to create a denseĀ atmosphere of dreadful inevitability.Ā One that is totallyĀ incongruent with Russell Boyd's meditative, almost painterly framing of the AustralianĀ countryside. If you do watch this film you'll probably be wondering what I'mĀ talking about for the first 20 minutes - whichĀ consists of an idyllic set-up to the youngĀ women's boarding school. But Weir soon adds anotherĀ dimension to these scenes with stark long shots ofĀ Hanging Rock. TheĀ mysterious rock formation that is the destination of the school trip andĀ inevitableĀ setting of theĀ mystery. Subtle dialogue elements, create a sense of unease leading up to the location, infusing it with an almostĀ otherworldlyĀ force that the girls were destined to encounter. Like Spoorloos, the duelling sides ofĀ indifference generated by theĀ presence of aĀ static rock formation hundreds of millions of years old, and the compulsions ofĀ teenage girls merge to create a film thatĀ defies definition. Don't expect answers, only expect to be carrying this film with you long after its runtime has gone. I watched this alone one hot summer's day during lockdown and was looking over my shoulder for the rest of the night. Not really knowing what I wasĀ expecting to see. It's hard enough to make an audience feel something but toĀ have them take a feeling with them they can'tĀ explain, even to themselves, that is truly impressive filmmaking.
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
TL;DR why should I spend exactly 1 hour 55 mins of my precious life watching this? One of the mostĀ haunting films I've ever seen. Let Peter Weir take you deep into the crevices of Hanging Rock, as horrific inevitability closes in allĀ around us inĀ broad, gorgeous daylight.
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
Trailer: Don't watch it, go in cold.Ā
*Available on BFI Player*Ā Ā Ā Ā
Fact: Damon Lindelof [Lost] sighted the film as an influence on the second season of theĀ underwatched 'Leftovers.' As aĀ bonus, thereĀ is a great quote from VincentĀ Canby when he wrote about the film for The New York Times. It sums up both films perfectly. "SuchĀ horror is unspeakable not because it isĀ gruesome but because it remains outside the realm of things that can be easilyĀ defined orĀ explained in conventional ways."Ā